United States v. Hines

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-20182 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARCUS D. HINES, Defendant-Appellant. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-102-1 -------------------- Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Marcus D. Hines has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hines has filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Hines’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.