R.O. v. State

COPE, J.

(dissenting).

We should affirm. The defense did not make any objection in the trial court that the judge had departed from neutrality. The only objection was that the trial *127court’s questions had broadened the scope of direct examination. The point is not preserved for appellate review. See Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701, 703 (Fla.1978).