ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
HAWKINS, Judge.Appellant again insists that we were in error in holding the evidence sufficient to support the conviction. Because of appellant’s earnestness, we have re-examined the evidence in the light of the motion and the oral argu*110ment in support thereof. No doubt arises in our mind as to the sufficiency of the evidence.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.
Overruled.