Moore v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant urges that we were wrong in holding the refusal of appellant’s application for continuance not hurtfully erroneous. We have carefully gone over the record and are but confirmed in our conclusion that the testimony of the absent witnesses would have been but cumulative, and that our judgment of affirmance was correct.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.

Overruled.