This is a liquor transportation case, with punishment assessed at a fine of $250.
Appellant was arrested while transporting beer and whisky in his automobile.
*546The sole question presented for review is the right of the officers to stop appellant and arrest him and search the automobile.
Calder, a deputy sheriff, was directed by those in charge of the sheriff’s office to call a certain telephone number. The telephone number was called. A woman answered and inquired “where they could get in touch with” Masters, to which inquiry Calder replied that he did not know. Thereupon the woman told Calder that “she knew Neil (the appellant) was coming in and was supposed to be transporting whiskey” and that he “was at the time transporting whiskey.”
Calder imparted this information to other peace officers whom he located in a cafe, and they then started looking for the appellant.
Appellant was apprehended and caused to get out of his car, in which a quantity of intoxicating liquor was found.
Appellant insists that the facts stated did not warrant the arrest and the search of the automobile.
An automobile may be searched for intoxicating liquor upon probable cause — that is, upon a reasonable ground of belief supported by circumstances warranting a cautious man in believing that intoxicating liquor is being unlawfully transported in the automobile. Sims v. State, 119 Texas Cr. Rep. 83, 45 S.W. 2d 579.
The information imparted to Officer Calder was sufficient to constitute probable cause to stop and search appellant’s automobile.
To support this conclusion, reliance is had upon the following cases:
Johnson v. State, 111 Texas Cr. Rep. 395, 13 S.W. 2d 114; Kirk v. State, 111 Texas Cr. Rep. 388, 13 S.W. 2d 106; Graves v. State 20 S.W. 2d 769; Weaver v. State, 117 Texas Cr. Rep. 335, 38 S.W. 2d 85; Long v. State, 149 Texas Cr. Rep. 483, 196 S.W. 2d 635; Baker v. State, 154 Texas Cr. Rep. 116, 225 S.W. 2d 828.
The judgment is affirmed.