ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
Appeal of - )
)
RQ-URS, JV ) ASBCA No. 62700
)
Under Contract No. N69450-15-D-1624 )
APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Jeffrey B. Baird, Esq.
Cory P. DiBene, Esq.
Finch, Thornton & Baird, LLP
San Diego, CA
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.
Navy Chief Trial Attorney
Matthew D. Bordelon, Esq.
Trial Attorney
OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE THRASHER
The parties have resolved their dispute and request that the Board enter judgment
in favor of appellant.
It is the Board’s decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the
parties’ stipulation and agreement, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature of a consent
judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of $170,000.00.
This amount is inclusive of Contract Disputes Act interest. No further interest shall be
paid.
Dated: September 1, 2021
JOHN J. THRASHER
Administrative Judge
Chairman
Armed Services Board
of Contract Appeals
(Signatures continued)
I concur I concur
RICHARD SHACKLEFORD J. REID PROUTY
Administrative Judge Administrative Judge
Vice Chairman Vice Chairman
Armed Services Board Armed Services Board
of Contract Appeals of Contract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62700, Appeal of RQ-URS,
JV, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.
Dated: September 2, 2021
PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS
Recorder, Armed Services
Board of Contract Appeals
2