Punta Gorda Bank v. State Bank

Cockrell, J.,

concurring: In my opinion, the interest of the Punta Gorda Bank in the contract of guaranty between the State Bank of Fort Meade and McAdow is too remote to form the basis of an independent action; the contract may, however, be a sufficient inducement or predicate upon which to found the absolute specific promise to pay alleged in the concluding paragraph of the declaration and upon this theory the declaration may be sustained. For this reason alone I concur in the reversal.