dissenting. — The affidavit for continuance does not comply with the rule in that it does not inform the court where and how the information was obtained by the affiants that the absent witnesses would testify as set forth in the indictment. Stinson v. State, 76 Fla. 421, 80 South. Rep. 506. Nor does it appear that the witness, Harvey, who' was mentioned in a former .affidavit for continuance, would not swear to the same facts.