concurred, remarking that the testimony of Bagley, Ñute and Stone was admitted as contradictory of other witnesses introduced by the defendant, and not upon the main question; and for such purpose was clearly admissible.
concurred, remarking that the testimony of Bagley, Ñute and Stone was admitted as contradictory of other witnesses introduced by the defendant, and not upon the main question; and for such purpose was clearly admissible.