[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-10806 JUNE 14, 2006
Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN
CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 05-80875-CV-WJZ
ANNA DINARDO,
AUGUSTA DINARDO,
VICTORIA DINARDO,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus
KAREN M. MILLER, Honorable,
Palm Beach County Circuit
Court Judge,
Defendant-Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(June 14, 2006)
Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The district court’s final order of dismissal is affirmed. See D.C. Ct. of
Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 482–88, 103 S. Ct. 1303, 1315–18 (1983);
Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 415–16, 44 S. Ct. 149, 150 (1923);
Goodman ex rel. Goodman v. Sipos, 259 F.3d 1327, 1332 (11th Cir. 2001); Siegel
v. LePore, 234 F.3d 1163, 1172 (11th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (“The Rooker-Feldman
doctrine provides that federal courts, other than the United States Supreme Court,
have no authority to review the final judgments of state courts. The doctrine
extends not only to constitutional claims presented or adjudicated by a state court,
but also to claims that are inextricably intertwined with a state court judgment. A
federal claim is inextricably intertwined with a state court judgment if the federal
claim succeeds only to the extent that the state court wrongly decided the issues
before it.”) (internal quotations and citations omitted).
AFFIRMED.
2