concurring.
As does the Chief Justice, I join the majority with the exception of footnote 12, and find no need to distinguish my position in Commonwealth v. Walker, — Pa.-, 92 A.3d 766, 2014 WL 2208139 (Pa.2014), from the present case. As in that case, I find neither need nor salience in allowing opinion testimony about the assessment or valuation of ordinary evidence, which is the peculiar responsibility of the jury.