On Motion for Rehearing.
LATTIMORE, J.The indictment in this case was filed February 27, 1931. Motion for a continuance was made on May 6th on the ground that appellant had just employed an attorney. We do not think the order overruling the application for continuance was erroneous. Appellant en-. tered his plea of guilty. There is no statement of facts. The indictment is not defective.
The motion for rehearing will be overruled.