United States v. Arana-Ascencio

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 6, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 07-40154 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BENEDICTO ARANA-ASCENCIO, also known as Juan Aranda-Silva, Defendant-Appellant. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:06-CR-633-1 -------------------- Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Benedicto Arana- Ascencio preserves for further review his contention that his sentence is unreasonable because this court’s post-Booker** rulings have effectively reinstated the mandatory Sentencing Guideline regime condemned in Booker. Arana-Ascencio concedes that his argument is foreclosed by United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511 (5th Cir. 2005), and its progeny, which have outlined this court’s methodology for reviewing sentences for * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. ** United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). No. 07-40154 -2- reasonableness. The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.