United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 14, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-10855
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANTHONY WATKINS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:06-CR-10-2
--------------------
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Anthony Watkins appeals his sentence following his guilty
plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute more
than 500 grams of cocaine. Watkins argues that he was improperly
sentenced based on a drug amount and type not specified in his
indictment. He also argues that the district court improperly
intimidated him into withdrawing this objection at sentencing.
Addressing Watkins’s claim of improper intimidation first,
we conclude that he has not shown any improper intimidation by
the district court. The district court correctly explained that
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 06-10855
-2-
by falsely denying his relevant conduct, Watkins was risking a
finding that he had not fully accepted responsibility for his
offense. See U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment. (n.1(a)) (2005).
Because the record demonstrates that Watkins voluntarily
withdrew his objection to the determination of his relevant
conduct, we conclude that he has waived this issue on appeal.
Waived objections are unreviewable on appeal. See United States
v. Musquiz, 45 F.3d 927, 931-32 (5th Cir. 1995).
AFFIRMED.