Shaw v. State

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Movant, Michael Shaw, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an eviden-tiary hearing.- We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been supplied stating the reasons for our so holding. Rule 84.16(b).