Motley v. State

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary *410hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).