ORDER
PER CURIAMMovant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The findings and con-*413elusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).