United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 15, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-40759
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARK CHARLES LARKIN,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:05-CR-206-ALL
--------------------
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Mark Charles Larkin was convicted by a jury and sentenced to
a total of 78-months of imprisonment for possessing with the intent
to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
§ 841(a)(1), and being a felon in possession of a firearm, in
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He now appeals.
Larkin argues that the district court erred in denying his
motion to suppress the evidence seized following the execution of
a search warrant at his residence. As the affidavit submitted in
support of the search warrant was more than a “bare bones”
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
affidavit, the officers who executed the warrant relied on it in
good faith, and the evidence was admissible. See United States v.
Satterwhite, 980 F.2d 317, 320-21 (5th Cir. 1992). The district
court did not err in denying Larkin’s motion to suppress.
Larkin also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence
supporting both of his convictions. Viewing the evidence in the
light most favorable to the verdict, we have determined that a
rational trier of fact could have found that the evidence
established Larkin’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt as to both
offenses. See United States v. McKnight, 953 F.2d 898, 901-03 &
n.3 (5th Cir. 1992).
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
2