Wengler v. State

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not *521clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).