ORDER
PER CURIAM.Defendant appeals after a jury convicted him of sodomy and the motion court denied his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. We find no error of law appears and the findings of fact of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5). Further, we find no precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended *682opinion and affirm by written order. Rule 30.25(b); Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only.