ORDER
PER CURIAM.Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury for delivery of a controlled substance, § 195.211, RSMo Supp.1993. He was sentenced in accord with the jury’s assessment to nine years’ imprisonment. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).