State v. Dunn

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment following his conviction by a jury of assault in the third degree, § 565.070 RSMo 1994, for which he was fined $500. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. A written opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).