ORDER
PER CURIAM.Daniel Kennemore challenges the sufficiency of the state’s evidence and a possible conflict of his defense attorney in his appeal of a class A misdemeanor in the third degree conviction. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
ORDER
PER CURIAM.Daniel Kennemore challenges the sufficiency of the state’s evidence and a possible conflict of his defense attorney in his appeal of a class A misdemeanor in the third degree conviction. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).