ORDER
PER CURIAM.John W. Hardy, defendant, appeals the judgment and sentence entered upon his conviction by a jury of stealing over $150, pursuant to Section 570.030 RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).