Vulles v. Thies & Talle

10/19/2021 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 21-0141 DA 21-0141 SAMANTHA VULLES, SHERI ESTENSON, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ORDER THIES & TALLE MANAGEMENT, INC., THIES & TALLE ENTERPRISES, INC., ALMANOR INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and JOHN DOES 1-4, FILED OCT 1 9 2021 Defendants and Appellees. Bowen Cirtenwoocl Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana Appellees have filed a motion to strike the affidavit of Patience Woodill and related exhibits attached to Appellants' reply brief filed on September 29, 2021. Appellees support their motion by arguing that Appellants cannot introduce new evidence to supplement the record for the first time on appeal. They further contend that the affidavit is inadmissible hearsay under M. R. Evid. 801 and 802. Appellants oppose the motion and respond that Appellees accused them of - forurn-shopping" in their response brief; therefore, Woodill's affidavit and related exhibits are the "only course of action to refute those unsubstantiated claims." We conclude it is appropriate to take the motion to strike under advisement and consider it in conjunction with consideration of the merits of the appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to strike the affidavit of Patience Woodill and related exhibits, attached to Appellants' reply brief, as well as all references thereto, is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. The Clerk of the Supreme Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record. DATED this aay of October, 2021. ChiefJustice /2- )-,47L,,, Justices