Stuker v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-0298V UNPUBLISHED LINDA STUKER, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: September 21, 2021 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Stipulation on Damages; Influenza HUMAN SERVICES, (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration Respondent. (SIRVA) Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Zoe Wade, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1 On March 16, 2020, Linda Stuker filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), which meets the Table definition for SIRVA, after receiving the influenza vaccine on January 16, 2018. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 1, 10; Stipulation, filed at Sept. 21, 2021, ¶¶ 1-2, 5. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the residual effects of her SIRVA for more than six months and that neither she nor any other party has filed a civil action or received compensation for her injury. Petition at ¶¶ 10-11; Stipulation at ¶¶ 4- 5. Respondent “denies that [P]etitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the vaccine caused [P]etitioner’s alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury; and denies that her current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.” Stipulation at ¶ 6. 1 Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Nevertheless, on September 21, 2021, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation: 1. A lump sum payment of $10,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner; and 2. A lump sum payment of $2,393.69, representing reimbursement of a Medicaid lien for services rendered to Petitioner by the State of Montana, in the form of a check payable jointly to Petitioner and Department of Public Health and Human Services, and mailed to: Department of Public Health and Human Services, Quality Assurance Division P.O. Box 202953 Helena, MT 59620 Medicaid ID: 14619. Stipulation at ¶ 8. Petitioner agrees to endorse the check to Department of Public Health and Human Services for satisfaction of the Medicaid lien. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id. I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIM:S omCE OF SPECIAL MASTERS LINDA STUKER, Petitioner, No. 20-298V ECF v. Chief Special Master Core oran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. STIPULATION The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters: 1. Linda Stuker (''petitioner"), filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccme Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (tru: "Vaccine Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly relate~ to peti1icmer's receipt of an influenza ('1lu") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Tab:le (the '7able"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a) 2. Petitioner received a flu vaccine on January 16, 2018. :t The vaccine was adr:nroistered within the United States. 4. Petitioner alleges that she sustained a shoulder injucy related to vaccine, adnrioistration (''SIRVAn) within the time period set forth in the Table, or in the alternative, that her alleged · shoulder injury was caused by the vaccine. She further alleges that she experienc,,d·th~ residual effects oftlm condition for more than silt months. 1 S. Petitioner represents that there bas been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on her behalf as a result of her alleged injury. 6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injllryj dc:nies that the vaccine caused petitioner's alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury; and dem~s that her CUITCnt condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related iajury. 7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled, and that a decision sboukt be entered awar