NUMBERS 13-20-00492-CV & 13-21-00085-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
SPEEDY CAR WASH, INCORPORATED
AND CARLOS A. GUERRA, GUARANTOR, Appellants,
v.
GERALD SHER, SUSAN SHER,
SPECIALTY CUISINE, INC. D/B/A
ISLE WASH AND ANDREW SHER,
TRUSTEE, Appellees.
On appeal from the 103rd District Court
of Cameron County, Texas.
ORDER
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Silva
Order Per Curiam
Appellants Speedy Car Wash, Inc. and Carlos A. Guerra, Guarantor have filed a
motion to determine sufficiency of security and motion for emergency relief seeking to
stay enforcement of the judgments in the underlying causes. See TEX. R. APP. P.
24.4(a)(4); id. R. 24.4(c). We previously granted the motion to stay enforcement of the
judgment, abated the causes, and remanded the case to the trial court to hold a hearing
pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 24. See TEX. R. APP. P. 24.4(c); see also
Kanan v. Plantation Homeowner's Ass'n, Inc., No. 13-11-00282-CV, 2012 WL 593067, at
*1 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg Feb. 21, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.).
The parties have since filed a Joint Stipulation Agreement, in which they stipulate
that the supersedeas bonds filed in the underlying causes are sufficient to supersede the
judgments and that enforcement of the judgments is now suspended pending appeal from
those causes. Having considered the parties’ Joint Stipulation Agreement, we conclude
that appellants’ motion to determine sufficiency of security is now moot. Therefore, we
dismiss appellants’ motion to determine sufficiency of security as moot, vacate our
November 5, 2021 order instructing the trial court to hold a hearing, and reinstate both
appellate causes.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed on the
17th day of November, 2021.
2
Speedy Car Wash, Incorporated and Carlos A. Guerra, Guarantor v. Gerald Sher, Susan Sher, Specialty Cuisine, Inc. D/B/A Isle Wash and Andrew Sher, Trustee
Combined Opinion