United States v. Akiba Matthews

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-7342 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. AKIBA MATTHEWS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Senior District Judge. (1:07-cr-00581-CCB-1) Submitted: December 16, 2021 Decided: December 20, 2021 Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Akiba Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Akiba Matthews appeals the district court’s order denying his renewed motions for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. Matthews correctly asserts that “district courts are empowered to consider any extraordinary and compelling reason for release that a defendant might raise,” United States v. McCoy, 981 F.3d 271, 284 (4th Cir. 2020) (cleaned up), and our review of the record reveals that Matthews did not waive his right to seek compassionate release on grounds apart from COVID-19. Nevertheless, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Matthews’ motions. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) (per curiam) (stating standard), cert. denied, No. 21-5624, 2021 WL 4733616 (U.S. Oct. 12, 2021). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2