Carroll v. New York Elevated Railroad & Manhattan Railway Co.

Van Brunt,. P. J. (dissenting):

I dissent. The exceptions were duly before tlie court. It is 'plain that that was the understanding of the court and counsel. They were then considered by plaintiff to be valueless, and, although he was mistaken, there is no reason for depriving the appellants of the ruling.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.