Reed v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

O’Brien, J. (concurring):

I do not think it can be held as matter of law that the driver was-plaintiff’s servant. Were it not for the allegation in the complaint that the plaintiff “owned and operated a ’bus” I should dissent. On that ground I concur in the result.

Hatch, J., concurred.

Judgment and order .reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.