The court at Special Term had jurisdiction to grant the order appealed from, under the authority of Lane v. New York Life Ins. Co. (56 Hun, 92). It does not seem to us that the appellant has any grievance on account of the amount fixed by the court below as payable in order to discharge the liability of the Equitable *471Life Assurance Society. He presented no affidavit bearing on that question, and we think that the recital in the order to the effect ■that his counsel appeared and consented “ to the said payment into -court,” implies an assent on his part that the amount offered and ■admitted to be due by the Equitable Life Assurance Society was all to which any claimant was entitled under the policy of insurance in controversy.
In the brief for the appellant, however, objection is made to the -award of fifty dollars costs to the Equitable Life Assurance Society to be deducted from the proceeds of the policy directed to be paid into court. We can see no propriety in this award of costs, and the order should be modified by striking it therefrom. Fo reason can be suggested why the claimants to the proceeds of an insurance policy should be compelled to pay anything to the insurance company because it is allowed to withdraw from a litigation by paying into court the sum of money which it concedes to be due to •somebody.
Order modified by striking out the award of fifty dollars costs to ■the Equitable Life Assurance Society, and as thus modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal.
Hirschberg, P. J., Jenks, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
Order modified by striking out the award of fifty dollars costs to the Equitable Life Assurance Society, and as thus modified affirmed, -without costs of this appeal.