Order modified so as to require the plaintiff, under-each date of alleged violation, to specify either the place or places, or the person or persons, where "or to whom it is alleged the defendant sold as and for certified m Ik, milk that had not been certified, and-as, thus modified affirmed, without.costs of this appeal to either party, All concurred, except Williams and Nash, JJ., who dissented and voted -for affirmance cf' the order. •
People v. Briggs
Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date filed: 1905-12-15
Citations: 110 A.D. 922, 96 N.Y.S. 1139
Copy CitationsLead Opinion