Lotz v. Levy

Gaynor, J.

,The letters between the parties do not show,that the defendant employed the plaintiffs, or that they produced a purchaser. ' They^ could not require the defendant to come to New York to meet proposed purchasers'; it was for them to produce, a purchaser tb him.

■ The judgment should be reversed.

Woodward, Jenks, Hooker and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Judgment reversed, and new .trial granted,Acosts to abide the.' event. .