Nappa v. Erie Railroad

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, J., who dissented upon the ground that the failure to properly secure the skid was a detail of the work, and the insecurity resulting therefrom was not a defect in the ways, works and machinery within the meaning of the Employers’ Liability Act.*

Laws of 1902, chap. 600. — [Rep.