United States v. Diaz

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 21, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 07-10015 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. RAYMOND EDWARDO DIAZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-30-3 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raymond Edwardo Diaz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Diaz has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Diaz’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 07-10015 Diaz’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Diaz’s request for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED. 2