United States v. Rodriguez-Mendoza

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
August 8, 2007
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 07-40140
Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EUSEBIO RODRIGUEZ-MENDOZA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:06-CR-930-1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Eusebio Rodriguez-Mendoza
raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523
U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision
and not a separate criminal offense. The appellant's motion for summary
disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.