People ex rel. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Woodbury

Order affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements.

All concurred, except Kellogg and Sewell, JJ., dissenting in part, being of the opinion that the relator is not assessable for street occupation where the street was opened and extended across the right of way the fee of which had been purchased by and conveyed to the relator before the street was opened.