Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kellogg and Houghton, JJ., who dissented on the ground that it is question of fact as to whether, the city used reasonable care in ascertaining whether or not a proper guard was maintained.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kellogg and Houghton, JJ., who dissented on the ground that it is question of fact as to whether, the city used reasonable care in ascertaining whether or not a proper guard was maintained.