Smith v. Smith

— J udgment reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the trial court erred in its rulings upon questions of evidence to the substantial prejudice of the defendants, they excepting at folios 84, 851, 445, 87-94, 355 and 308-310. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., not voting.