Judgment of Special Term reversed and judgment of City Court affirmed, with costs of this appeal and in the Special Term to the plaintiff. Held, First. That the plaintiff made out a case for damages for breach of the covenant contained in the contract. Second. That the City Court adopted a proper measure of damages. (See King v. Hudson River Realty Co., 141 App. Div. 346; Pollock v. Queens Land & Title Co., 147 id. 671.) All concur.