Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that the parties by their conduct under similar policies in the past had construed the meaning of this clause — the right of the assured to go to a dry dock south of Piermont. Manning, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur; Jaycox, J., dissents on the ground of a breach of warranty in going south of Piermont, contrary to the terms of the policy, with whom Blackmar, P. J., concurs.