[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MAY 15, 2007
No. 06-13929 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 05-80159-CR-DTKH
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PEDRO ENRIQUE SERRANO,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(May 15, 2007)
Before BLACK, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Arthur Wallace, appointed counsel for Pedro Serrano, has filed a motion to
withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of
the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the
appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no
arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Serrano’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED. However, we discovered a
scrivener’s error in the judgment and, therefore, this case is REMANDED for the
limited purpose of correcting the judgment so that it indicates that the statute of
conviction was 21 U.S.C. § 846.
2