United States v. Austin

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 24, 2007 No. 06-10861 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. DEREK ERNEST AUSTIN Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-1-ALL Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Derek Ernest Austin appeals the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for being a felon in possession of ammunition. He argues that his sentence is unconstitutional in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), because it was based on facts not presented to a jury and to which he did not admit. The Government seeks to enforce the appeal waiver provision in Austin’s plea agreement and moves for summary affirmance or dismissal. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 06-10861 Austin’s appeal waiver was knowing and voluntary, and therefore, the waiver is enforced. See United States v. Melancon, 972 F.2d 566, 567-68 (5th Cir. 1992). Moreover, Austin’s argument does not come within one of the enumerated exceptions to his appeal waiver. As such, we do not address the merits of Austin’s challenge to his sentence. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED. The Government’s motion to dismiss is DENIED. The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time is DENIED as moot. 2