Order dismissing writ of habeas corpus reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, writ sustained and relator discharged. When the surety company paid the amount directed to be paid by the relator in the order of November 20, 1924, there was a compliance with the court’s order and thus there could not be a contempt thereof. Lazansky, P. J., Rich and Seudder, JJ., concur; Young and Seeger, JJ., dissent.-