Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion to discharge appellant granted. The motion was practically unopposed and the reason advanced by the learned surrogate for his denial is not convincing. Further, there is no opposition to a reversal in this court. In any event we are of opinion that appellant is now entitled to be discharged from custody. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
In re the Judicial Settlement of Intermediate Account of Proceedings of Tevlin
Related Cases
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account in Proceedings of Tevlin
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account in Proceedings of Tevlin
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account in Proceedings of Tevlin
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Voluntary Account of Proceedings of Irving Bank-Columbia Trust Co.
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of United States Trust Co.