Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Edgcomb and Thompson, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts and for granting a new trial, on the ground that the court erred in permitting plaintiff’s attorney to cross-examine plaintiff’s witness Snyder, whom he had vouched for as worthy of belief, in an endeavor to impeach his evidence, and upon the further ground that counsel for plaintiff exceeded the proper limits in his summary.