■ Order denying appellants’ motion to vacate and set aside an order to show cause dated May 23, 1940, why the purchaser at a final sale should not be compelled to complete its purchase and to require the individual appellants, as the real parties in interest, to furnish the consideration necessary to consummate the contract of sale, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
In re the Rehabilitation of Bond & Mortgage Guarantee Co.
Related Cases
- In re Proposal or Plan by All of the Holders of Mortgage Investments for Readjustment, Modification or Reorganization of the Rights of All of Such Holders of Investments in a Certain Mortgage Covering Premises Known as 602-4 Cary Avenue
- Mathews v. Ropag Realty Corp.
- James W. Hughes Corp. v. Annadale Gardens, Inc.
- In re Proposal or Plan by All of Holders of Mortgage Investments for Readjustment, Modification or Reorganization of the Rights of All of Such Holders of Investments in a Certain Mortgage Covering Premises Known as 602-4 Cary Avenue
- Lawyers Title & Guaranty Co. v. Fifty-sixth Street Construction Co.