Hill, P. J., Crapser, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur; Heffernan, J., dissents. I dissent and vote to reverse the judgment of conviction on the ground that the remarks of the District Attorney were prejudicial and inflammatory. The trial court made a serious error in permitting such an unwarranted license of tongue.
People v. Gould
Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date filed: 1942-12-29
Citations: 265 A.D. 981
Copy CitationsLead Opinion