Weinstein v. Board of Regents of University of New York

Schenck, J.

(dissenting). I dissent. From the entire record there is substantial evidence to sustain the determination of the Board of Regents, and such determination should be affirmed.

Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur with Hill, P. J.; Schenck, J., dissents with a memorandum in which Heffernan, J., concurs.

Determination annulled, with fifty dollars costs, and matter remitted. [See post, p. 841.]