Mercer Milling Co. v. State

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur. (The order denies defendant’s motion to dismiss a claim for alleged interference with, and appropriation of, part of the water power rights of claimants at Baldwinsville as the result of Barge Canal construction and operation.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ. [See post, p. 869.]